Showing posts with label road safety. Show all posts
Showing posts with label road safety. Show all posts

Friday, 3 January 2014

“Cameras need to be set up fairly and signed clearly so that drivers are not unduly punished” say RAC



By Helen Wells

New figures revealing the number of fines issued for bus lane and ‘yellow box’ offences (amongst other things) by London drivers have received widespread news coverage today. The reporting has, predictably, focused on the injustice of punishing drivers for breaking the law. The RAC has contributed to this narrative by suggesting that there is something inherently devious about punishing drivers without giving them due warning, or for enforcing laws for ‘minor’ breaches (the definition of which is unclear). Generally speaking, such injustice and unfairness narratives have typified any attempts to encourage drivers to obey the law in recent years, with the heated debate about speed cameras being only one example. An RAC spokeswoman also suggested that "Motorists are generally law abiding and want to obey the rules." Statistics suggest, however, that such a law-abiding identity is more attractive than it is realistic, with drivers keen to resist the implication of law-breaking even when evidence suggests otherwise. Indeed, it is common for the law, the enforcement methods, the motives of the enforcers, or all three, to be called into question as part of the efforts of the ‘law-abiding’ to resist the implication that they are otherwise. What strikes me as interesting in this current reporting is that, with drivers encouraged to see themselves as ‘targeted’, ‘milked’ and ‘persecuted’ (depending on your choice of news source), the fact that offending drivers are offending against, inconveniencing, delaying or endangering each other seems to be effectively overlooked. Drivers are encouraged to think of themselves as a united bunch, and not to think of other offending motorists as obstructions or obstacles to their free and safe passage (as the enforcement rationale would encourage us to see them). Whilst the ‘oppressed majority’ narrative may be sustainable in the case of speeding (where drivers may be able to view other speeding drivers as facilitating their own speedy journey, and where slow drivers are more likely to come in for censure), such a stance in relation to offences that give other drivers an unfair advantage (bus lane incursions) or which cause other drivers to be delayed (yellow box offences) is surprisingly popular.

Such narratives were the focus of my recent presentation to the Road Safety Scotland annual seminar in Edinburgh, and a report on that presentation was published last week in the Road Safety Scotland newsletter Direction which can be found here.

Tuesday, 16 June 2009

£20k awarded to evaluate a project designed to reduce young drivers' crash risk

A Keele Criminologist, in partnership with Staffordshire County Council, has recently been successful in obtaining £20,000 to fund an evaluation of a road safety intervention. Dr Helen Wells, of the Research Institute for Law, Politics and Justice, along with members of the Road Safety & Sustainable Travel Unit at Staffordshire County Council were awarded the funds as part of the RoSPA/BNFL scholarship competition, designed to fund projects which offered 'to carry out research into safety and accident prevention that will produce defined, practical and influential outcomes to help save lives and prevent injuries.' The evaluation project was one of three funded projects selected from over 30 shortlisted applications and the award of the money was made at a lavish awards dinner in Birmingham last month. The RoSPA scholarship scheme was funded by a bequest of £500,000 from BNFL (British Nuclear Fuels Limited), and is intended to run for the next seven to ten years.

The joint project aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a crucial element of the Council’s Young Driver Programme – a resource to improve relationships between the parent, young driver, and professional driving instructor during the young driver’s learning period.

Young drivers are over-represented in road casualty statistics. Drivers aged between 16 and 25 years old accounted for 26 per cent of all car drivers killed or seriously injured in 2007 whilst constituting only 13% of the UK population. However, increasing driving experience before the driving test has been shown to reduce the risk of an accident. Private practice involving the parent and young driver is a common way of increasing experience and exposure.

The Cohort II study published by the DfT last year revealed that out of 10, 000 new drivers, 59% had embarked on private practice sessions with relatives or friend. The quality of such private advice however is variable with one survey revealing that 31% of 18-29 year olds had picked up ‘bad habits’ from their parents during practice sessions.

Staffordshire County Council’s Road Safety & Sustainable Travel Unit has developed a Coaching Programme aimed at mentoring young people through the learning process. A Resource Pack provided as part of the programme intends to align parental advice with that of the learner’s Approved Driving Instructor (ADI), and to assist parents in managing private practice. The pack focuses on the relationship between the young driver, their parents, and their ADI.

The aim of the Resource Pack is to improve the relationship between the parent, young driver and ADI, to have a positive impact on the young drivers’ driving practices, leading to a reduction in risk-taking behaviour and, consequently, to a reduction in the numbers of young drivers involved in road crashes. The evaluation will take place over the next 6-8 months.